Could the attacks on Libya lead to a bigger conflict (WWIII)?

Some people may think this is a stretch and that everyone seems to try and make things bigger and scarier than they appear. We don't necessarily disagree with that, but this is not our intention with this article. The truth is that many countries are already involved in the Libyan conflict going on right now, which started as a humanitarian mission to stop the senseless killing of the protesting, Libyan people. As far as we know, to date, this is still the case.

We posted on Twitter yesterday this tweet; "Tell us this isn't wht Nostradamus saw when e wrote the quatrains. Many nations attacking each other & themselves, tsunamis, erthqks, oil..". We also posted this at an early time; "Radiation, OilSpills, Earthquakes, Tsunamis, Wars, Peoples Rights and Freedoms. We are so F**ked.", these posts relate and kind of led us to our thinking more about Nostradamus and what we've read, in the past, about things he said. Shortly after these posts we noticed on the news sites how Russia was regretting the attacks on Libya and wanted the attacks to stop quickly. As the news kept coming we noticed China was also stating it's regret for the attacks being done and wanted them to stop as well, as soon as possible. Africa has also joined in on the opposition to the attacks by the UN on Libya. The thing is that if this doesn't end soon, how long until one or all of them start to trickle in to try and protect Libyan leaders and stop the attacks by the UN coalition and the United States. We began to think about Nostradamus a little more and what he predicted about WWIII.

First off, we'd like to admit that Nostradamus is vague and people can argue that you can make anything he said seem to apply to something. We agree that this can be argued all day back and forth, whatever. While this is partially true, the truth is also that he is revered because in at least some cases, you cannot deny his accuracy or at least how close he comes to hitting the nail on the head. With that said, this is some of what he says about WWIII and the players in that conflict.

    "[V.54] From beyond the Black Sea and great Tartary, there will be a king who will come to see
    France. He will pass through Alania and Armenia and leave his bloody rod in Byzantium"
   

  Interpretation:  
    "It appears that a certain leader, probably from Russia, Central Asia or China will come to conquer
    France. Is this the Man from the East in II.29 ? It seems that Russia and China will ally with the
    Islamic forces in World War III. In fact such a large scale attack on Europe is possible when the
    might of a country like China or Russia is behind the Eastern Alliance."



    [V.27] With fire and weapons, not far from the Black Sea, he will come from Persia to occupy
    Trebizond. Pharos and Mytilene tremble, the Sun is bright, the Adriatic sea covered with
   Arab blood.
   
   

Interpretation:

   A notable Iranian commander will come to fight in the Adriatic along with the Arabs. There will be
   losses in the eastern side too.


   [VI.80] From Fez the kingdom will stretch out to those of Europe. The city blazes, the sword
   will slash; the great man of Asia with a great troop of blue by land and sea, he will drive out
   the cross to death.


     

Interpretation:

   Finally the great army from Asia led by a great leader will defeat the Euro-American allied forces
   and occupy Europe. 


   [VI.21] When those of the Northern Pole are united together in the East will be great fear and
   dread. A new man elected, supported by the great one who trembles, both Rhodes and
   Byzantium will be stained with Arab blood.


     

Interpretation:

   Russia, who upto this point was either neutral or in the eastern alliance, probably after a change in
   its leadership, will somehow join US against the Eastern forces resulting in the weakening of the
   eastern position. A new commander of the joint allied forces (or a new President of USA) will take
   charge and the results will the the first defeat of the eastern forces in the Mediterranean and Turkey.
   This is probably the turning point of the war. 





   Source: http://www.vers-la-lumiere.net/doc/nostradamus.pdf

If you read, just the source we posted for the above statements, you will see that many of the players in his predictions are also players in this current conflict, Italy, France, etc. With the opposition being publicly stated from Russia, China and Africa, we can only surmise that, if this conflict drags out, as things in the Middle East tend to do, when the US is involved especially,  then a possibility of this becoming something more is not completely out of the question. Our fear is that this world and its population are in enough trouble and we do not need to blindly let this escalate.

We believe helping the people is the right thing to do, but we're also aware that we must keep our eyes open and make sure this isn't, or doesn't become about oil and more of the corporations oil wars. Why is it that we jump right in when it's Libya, one of the worlds biggest oil producers, but Egypt was left to fend for themselves. We know Egypt can't quite be compared to Libya because Mubarak was not out right attacking his people in the same way, and that makes sense. It would be nice to believe that this is all about, the right thing to do by our government, but lately, that's getting harder and harder to believe.

So, could the attacks on Libya lead to a bigger conflict (WWIII)? The answer is yes. The truth, again, is that any conflict could eventually lead to a potential WWIII. It is necessary to pay attention and not let things get out of control or become personal. There's nothing wrong with walking away from a conflict when it no longer is in your, or anyones best interest to be there. We cannot ignore the predictions from the past that possibly give us keys to identify when something is or maybe coming. If we pay attention and use our heads instead of worrying about more profits and control, we may just be humane enough to avoid it.

AFSOCS